🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.