🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about that comments delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the US Open last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, Fowler is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment would have been appropriate. Rather, he brought up the continued drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). He stated in press following his defeat that he actually preferred his path, because it offered the chance to beat the three best players in the sport in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else in their right mind had the lack of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class delivery and powerful power on both forehand and backhand are more than enough to defeat most opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, however, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few seasons has seen the curious rise of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless move around with the surprising speed and grace of much shorter men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable advancements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly exploded up to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, competing against and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best run to the All England Club last four in July.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four sets, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the point of frustration. When Fritz eventually did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a horrendous service game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use excessive energy to win it. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to the sky. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It was not a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad evidence that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, who lost to Alcaraz in the next round and did not particularly seem like he believed he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed enough knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than almost anyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only express how he feels or the tactic he felt determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for America not spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of winning a major. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying empire is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {